Under the spotlight: the 3 Parallel Import Recommendations

Guest blogger:   Sheryl Gwyther author

Under the spotlight : The Productivity Commission’s Three Recommendations are now being considered by a carefully-selected Working Party in government.

On the 17th September the Working Party will present their findings to the Federal Government – a decision that will affect the future of Australian books and the many connecting industries.

All three Recommendations have the potention to damage the production of future Australian-authored books.

The Government should repeal Australia’s Parallel Import Restrictions (PIRs) for books. The repeal should take effect three years after the date that it is announced.

The Government should, as soon as possible, review the current subsidies aimed at encouraging Australian writing and publishing, with a view to better targeting of cultural externalities. Any revised arrangements should be put in place before the repeal of the PIRs takes effect.

Presently, the Federal Government commits to recognising the importance of the ARTS and CREATIVITY in encouraging a fully-rounded Australian society.

It does this through the Grants, Fellowships and Subsidies from the Australia Council for worthy projects. And these are hotly contested.

The PC’s Recommendation 2 will force all Australian writers to go cap-in-hand begging from the Australian taxpayer just so they can continue to write. If you’re writing a romance or a murder mystery you can’t access a grant.

So what happens to those authors who will lose out when publishers can’t afford to take them on, AND they can’t access Australia Council grants? Has the Productivity Commission even considered this?

Recommendation 2 seems as though it was stuck on to appease authors – well, guess what, it doesn’t!

The outcome from the repeal of the PIRs and any revised subsidy arrangements should be monitored and assessed five years after implementation. To assist that assessment, the Australian Bureau of Statistics should, as soon as possible, undertake a revised version of its 2003-04 surveys on the books industry and market, having regard to the information gaps and interpretation problems identified in this study and relevant data held by other agencies. It should then update these revised surveys prior to the commencement of the five year assessment.

This should have been done before the Productivity Commission even sat down at their table to pick over the bones of the Restrictions against Parallel Importation of Books. How could they have made their decisions without even using current and up-to-date data?

Hopefully the Working Party will see through the Productivity Commission’s conclusions and conclude for themselves that the PC’s wordy report is not even worth the thousands of tax-payers’ dollars it took to print it out.


One thought on “Under the spotlight: the 3 Parallel Import Recommendations

  1. Recommendation 3 really makes me angry.

    The horse has bolted – now we should do a study of whether the gate was securely shut.

    Too late! 5 years down the track irreparable damage will have been done.

    ‘Information gaps and interpretation problems’?
    These gaps and problems are what the Productivity Commission has based its recommendations on! Unbelievable. A 2004 study that is 5 years out of date. If it wasn’t so damaging I would be laughing.

    And I am embarrassed that the Productivity Commission is supposed to represent the best interests of Australians. Which Australians? Certainly none I know.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s